US allows UN ceasefire vote, but it’s too late for Gazans


You are reading an excerpt from the Worldview Today newsletter. Sign up and get the rest for freeincluding news from around the world as well as interesting ideas and opinions, delivered to your inbox every weekday.

On Monday, the United States took unexpected action Abstained from voting in UN Security Council Call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. The U.S. abstention allowed the resolution to pass 14-0, marking the first time in more than five months that the United Nations’ top decision-making body has successfully taken steps to punish Israel for its air and ground offensive against militant group Hamas.also highlighted The growing rift The conflict between the Biden administration and Israel’s wartime government led by right-wing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Unlike a U.S.-backed resolution that failed to pass last week, the resolution backed by Russia and China did not link calls for a ceasefire to the release of hostages held by Hamas. Rather, it expresses them as separate, independent provisions to be made during Ramadan. It hopes an immediate ceasefire will lead to a “sustainable and lasting ceasefire”.

The United States has used its veto power three times in the Security Council over decades as diplomatic cover for Israel since Hamas launched a deadly attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7 that sparked all-out war.The failure to exercise that prerogative on Monday demonstrated the White House’s commitment to Israel’s actions during the warThis included the destruction of much of Gaza’s civilian infrastructure, attacks on hospitals and restrictions on the flow of international humanitarian aid into the enclave. Senior U.S. officials also expressed opposition to Netanyahu’s plans to launch a ground offensive in the southern Gaza town of Rafah, where more than a million displaced Palestinians are seeking asylum.

News that the United States has abstained trigger an angry reaction From Netanyahu and his allies. The embattled Israeli leader canceled a planned visit to Washington this week by a delegation of his advisers. Israeli Defense Minister Yov Galante has arrived in town. The U.S. decision not to veto the U.N. resolution “hurts both the war effort and efforts to free the hostages because it gives Hamas hope that international pressure will allow them to accept a ceasefire without releasing our abductees.” “. Netanyahu’s office said in a statement.

See also  Joe Biden vs Donald Trump - How the race will be won or lost

U.S. officials disputed such claims, insisting their abstention did not represent a change in policy direction. “There’s no reason to view this as some sort of escalation,” White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said. tell reporters. “There are no changes in our policy. We still want to see a ceasefire. We still want to rescue all the hostages. We still want to see more humanitarian aid getting into the hands of the people of Gaza.”

The United Nations Security Council on March 25 demanded an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and the release of all hostages. The United States abstained from the vote. (Video: Reuters)

For many in Gaza, the Security Council’s passage came too late. We are halfway through Ramadan, a month-long holy period characterized by marked sadness and pain in the Palestinian territories. Israel’s actions in Gaza have killed more than 32,000 Palestinians, including many women and children, forced the vast majority of Gazans to flee their homes and plunged more than half of Gaza’s population into de facto famine.Young children are dying of malnutrition, UN official says The most widespread and severe food crisis in the world.

U.S. officials briefing reporters viewed Netanyahu’s reaction to his abstention as Prime Minister’s posture in the struggle for political survival at home.Netanyahu also A deep dive into Washington’s partisan divideAppearing virtually at Republican senators’ briefings while publicly feuding with Democratic lawmakers and the Biden administration. But his domestic rivals similarly denied the impact of the resolution, which U.S. officials deemed “non-binding.”

“The state of Israel has a moral obligation to continue fighting until the hostages are returned and the threat from Hamas is eliminated, and that’s what we will do,” Benny Ganz saysNetanyahu’s former enemy is now a war cabinet minister. “The Security Council’s decision has no operational implications for us.”

On Monday, Israeli troops Continuing their week-long raid Israel claims Hamas has a presence at Shifa Hospital in Gaza City.Israel also said it would cease cooperation with Israel UNRWAIt is the United Nations agency that provides the most aid to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, and United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called it “a ray of light for millions of people.”

See also  Washington pressures Austria to abandon deal with Russian tycoon

Through it all, the United States has worked closely with Israel, giving the green light for a surge in arms transfers to bolster the Israeli military’s relentless bombing campaign.Senior observer of U.S.-Israel relations debate Biden is too unwilling to use the outsized influence Washington wields over the Jewish state, including withholding or limiting military aid.

Even Republican administrations in the 20th century did so, although more recent U.S. administrations have been more enthusiastic about maintaining close ties with Israel. “The willingness to use aid relationships as leverage has declined dramatically in recent years,” said Martin Indyk, the Obama administration’s special envoy for Palestinian-Israeli negotiations. tell the new york times. “The dependencies are there, just waiting to be exploited.”

Palestinian critics of U.S. approaches see little reason for optimism in the slight disagreement between Biden and Netanyahu. What efforts the White House claims it is taking to restrain Israel and provide emergency aid to Gaza, Tariq Kenney-Shawa of Al-Shabaka writesPalestinian think tanks “buy Israel time by distracting the public with high-profile rhetoric about human rights and concerns for Palestinian civilians, while doing their best to ensure that the flow of arms continues uninterrupted to Israel.”

Analysts are increasingly skeptical of what might happen if hostilities cease, whenever they cease and regardless of U.N. resolutions. Outside of Netanyahu’s right-wing nationalist camp, the Israeli public has shown little interest in discussing a “two-state solution” or a political process that would address Palestinian demands for equal rights or statehood. The cost of rebuilding Gaza will be astronomical and may take decades – arguably, the area is still recovering from the impact of Israel’s small-scale operation in 2014.

Arab governments are developing vague, fragile plans for the management of Gaza, relying on unrealized Israeli political acquiescence, on unrealized neutral Hamas, and on unrealized international funding.

“Few believe that any kind of multinational peacekeeping force can be established, or that the Gulf states will provide the huge sums of money necessary for reconstruction,” Jason Burke of The Guardian wrote in a pessimistic article Gaza’s postwar future lacks any clarity. “The result is a slow slide toward the default option, where those who can muster the most coercive power take control.”



Source link

By Ali Raza

I am a dedicated and skilled News Content Writer with a passion for delivering accurate and engaging stories to a diverse audience. With a solid background in journalism and a keen eye for detail, I bring a commitment to excellence and a deep understanding of the evolving media landscape.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *